**Apologies for cross-postings**
CALL FOR CHAPTER PROPOSALS
Positive Human-AI
Interaction
Fostering
Psychological Well-being in the Age of Artificial
Intelligence
===========================================================================================
Submission Dates:
Chapter Proposal (Short abstract or key points to be addressed in the contribution
):
on or before October 15, 2025
(Feedback within approx. 14 days)
Full Chapter (15-18 pages,
Latex
or
Word
template) :
January 31, 2026
(Double-blind Review until February
28, 2026)
Final Chapter: April 30, 2026
===========================================================================================
Background:
In recent years, the explosive rate at
which artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are being
introduced and adopted in personal and professional contexts
has far outpaced research investigating their psychological
implications for users. On the one hand, AI-enabled
applications are being marketed as enhancements to human
cognition and as positive contributors to productivity and
efficiency. On the other hand, researchers have raised
concerns against indiscriminate adoption of AI technologies,
and have argued that, in order for AI to make a positive
contribution to the human condition, it is crucial that AI
development be aligned with human values.
One of the core challenges is to design AI-based applications to prevent harm, and foster human psychological well-being (PWB), which has two main conceptualizations. The hedonic view considers the presence of positive affect and absence of negative affect (i.e. positive user experience) as a sign of PWB; the eudaimonic view focuses on those motivations, dispositions and activities which lead to flourishing or functioning well, and whose presence can be evaluated by the extent to which one senses meaning, growth, positive relationships, excellence and autonomy in various spheres of one's life. This perspective is endorsed by theories such as Self-Determination Theory (SDT). Furthermore, researchers also argue that eudaimonic well-being also relies on an ethical core -- for to live well, we need to develop those virtues which help us choose well between a range of competing goals and desires, and guide our behavior in everyday situations.
As developments in AI increasingly
allow us to integrate them in various professional and
personal activities, the nature and scope of this integration
could potentially transform what we value, along with our
attitudes and experiences in, these activities. Consequently,
this may also affect the extent to which we can attain the
aforementioned constituents of PWB. Either way, whether
AI-based technologies are designed, evaluated, and deployed
with a view of PWB in mind will have profound cognitive and
affective consequences on users.
The aim of this book volume is to
gather multidisciplinary perspectives on harnessing the
potential of AI to enhance PWB. We invite researchers from
different disciplines (information systems, computer science,
social sciences and philosophy) to contribute to the current
state of research on designing and evaluating the algorithmic
and interactive aspects of AI with the aim of enhancing PWB.
The multiple perspectives captured in this book will be useful
for designers, researchers, and practitioners.
We invite contributions including,
and related to:
Theoretical Contributions
– Characteristics of AI that
potentially impact psychological well-being
– Theoretical viewpoints
– Ethics of AI and well-being
– Critical perspectives
– Position Papers
– Reflections on past research
– Literature Reviews
Methodology
– Prototyping
– Participatory design
– Tools for design, modeling and
evaluation
– Ethical considerations in design
– Integrating stakeholders’
perspectives
– Measuring cognitive and affective aspects of well-being in human-AI interaction
Concepts and Applications
– Novel interaction concepts
– Interaction design
– Domain-specific applications
– Application of AI frameworks in design and evaluation
Evaluations
– Empirical studies (Laboratory or
Field Studies)
– Quantitative and qualitative
evaluations
– Case-studies
– Implications for work and leisure